<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Dinner in the Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/</link>
	<description>phil haack: putting the hyper in hyperlink</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138108</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138108</guid>
		<description>If they REALLY want to boost ratings, they should show how CHILDREN are made on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they REALLY want to boost ratings, they should show how CHILDREN are made on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Haack</title>
		<link>http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138092</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Haack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138092</guid>
		<description>I don't think eating healthier and knowing how to make creme brulee or boar salami are incompatible goals at all.  Admittedly, I'm sure Channel 4 was happy about the gross-out factor of showing factory farming and the slaughter on TV, but I think shocking audiences might be a good thing in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think eating healthier and knowing how to make creme brulee or boar salami are incompatible goals at all.  Admittedly, I&#8217;m sure Channel 4 was happy about the gross-out factor of showing factory farming and the slaughter on TV, but I think shocking audiences might be a good thing in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mom</title>
		<link>http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138088</link>
		<dc:creator>mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuralgraffiti.com/archives/2008/01/16/looking-dinner-in-the-eye/#comment-138088</guid>
		<description>Ok, it's fine to know where your food comes from, and how it's slaughtered.  However, I have a problem with a chef cutting up a fat corpse on tv (channel 4 in the UK)to make a point about eating healthier when he makes things like creme brulee, black pudding, and boar salami. Are you trying to educate or shock for ratings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it&#8217;s fine to know where your food comes from, and how it&#8217;s slaughtered.  However, I have a problem with a chef cutting up a fat corpse on tv (channel 4 in the UK)to make a point about eating healthier when he makes things like creme brulee, black pudding, and boar salami. Are you trying to educate or shock for ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
